Child seat or booster? The Court of Appeal decides…

  • Posted

The Court of Appeal has today upheld a High Court decision that a mother was partly to blame for her child’s injuries having used a child booster seat to restrain her child on a car journey instead of a child seat.

The Court of Appeal agreed that the injuries sustained by the three year old in the car accident would have been largely avoided if a child seat had been used.

The child was on a booster seat which, according to the manufacturer’s instructions, was not suitable for someone of their age, height or weight. Whilst it was accepted that the defendant driver was wholly to blame for the accident, the trial Judge found that if the child had been appropriately restrained in a child seat she would only have suffered slight injuries.

The Judge’s view was that whilst manufacturers’ instructions should not be the only factor in determining who is to blame for someone’s injuries, where the instructions are clear, they should be followed and it was wrong to do otherwise, no matter how well intentioned and understandable the reasons for doing so may have been. The Court of Appeal agreed and upheld the original finding that the mother should contribute 25% towards her child’s compensation.

Tom Ranson of Ashtons Legal Injury Services comments: “It is important that we take appropriate safety precautions when travelling, both in relation to ourselves and those in our care. Indeed, the message is clear: read and follow safety instructions.”


    Close

    How can we help you?


    Please fill in the form and we’ll get back to you as soon as possible or to speak to one of our experts call
    0330 404 0749





    I accept that my data will be held for the purpose of my enquiry in accordance with Ashtons
    Privacy Policy


    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    How can we help?

    If you have an enquiry or you would like to find out more about our services, why not contact us?